The short answer is that the book is the most intimate Matilda, the 1996 film the most visually storybook-like, and the West End musical the most communal and self-aware. The 2022 film is a useful fourth point of comparison: it is not a remake of the 1996 film, but a screen adaptation of the stage musical.
One story, four different engines
Roald Dahl’s Matilda begins with a child who is intellectually far ahead of the adults around her. The Roald Dahl Story Company’s character guide makes the book’s basic arrangement clear: Matilda reads voraciously, is dismissed by the Wormwoods, meets the supportive Miss Honey and faces the bullying headmistress Miss Trunchbull. The novel’s power comes from the gap between what Matilda understands and what grown-ups refuse to see. It is a reader’s story before it is a spectacle: books are her refuge, her education and eventually the language through which she makes sense of injustice.
That gives each adaptation a different problem to solve. A novel can pause for a joke, a narrator’s aside or a description of a child’s inner life. A film has to externalise those things through performance, design and editing. A musical must go further still: it has to turn thought into action that can be shared by a room full of people.
The book: imagination as private power
Dahl’s version is the clearest on Matilda’s solitary intelligence. Her reading is not decoration; it is how she builds an alternative world while her parents watch television and treat her as a nuisance. Even the supernatural element grows out of that pressure. Her powers feel like a release of concentrated attention: the mind that has been ignored finds a way to act.
The book also distributes its wickedness among several adults. Mr and Mrs Wormwood represent anti-intellectualism at home; Trunchbull turns institutional authority into fear; Miss Honey offers the humane adult response. Bruce Bogtrotter, Amanda Thripp and Lavender matter because they show that Matilda’s story is not only about being exceptionally clever. It is about what happens when children recognise unfairness together.
For a reader, that balance between individual brilliance and collective sympathy is the book’s distinctive pleasure. Matilda is extraordinary, but Dahl’s world is populated by ordinary children who need someone to believe them.
The 1996 film: a modern fairy tale with a child’s-eye frame
The 1996 film’s official synopsis describes Matilda as a “super-smart little girl” misunderstood by her parents, brother and school principal, helped by a brave friend and a wonderful teacher. That is a revealing emphasis. Danny DeVito’s film treats the material as a self-contained family fantasy: it has the speed, faces and visual punch of cinema, while keeping the emotional route through friendship and Miss Honey.
Its main trade-off is one familiar to literary adaptations. The camera can make the Wormwoods’ selfishness, Trunchbull’s menace and Matilda’s telekinesis immediate, but it has less room for the book’s narrator-like intimacy. The result is not simply “the book brought to life”; it is a film that makes Matilda’s world legible through comic exaggeration and a strong visual point of view. It presents the core story in a compact, non-singing format.
The West End musical: turning rebellion into a public event
The Royal Shakespeare Company’s musical changes the centre of gravity. The London production has a book by Dennis Kelly, original music and lyrics by Tim Minchin, and direction by Matthew Warchus, as the official West End production page sets out. Instead of leaving Matilda’s intelligence mostly inside her head, the score gives different kinds of feeling their own theatrical form. “Naughty” makes self-determination a manifesto; “When I Grow Up” lets children and adults share the same longing; “Revolting Children” turns resentment into collective momentum.
That is more than adding songs to a familiar plot. Musical theatre makes the theme of storytelling physical. Children do not merely hear that they can change their stories: they sing, dance and reshape the classroom around them. Kelly’s adaptation also gives the storytelling frame a larger role, while Minchin’s lyrics can hold sarcasm, anger and tenderness in the same number. The RSC’s account of the show’s development records substantial restructuring, with characters discarded, songs removed and scenes combined before the 2010 Stratford-upon-Avon production. In other words, the stage version’s confidence comes from editing the novel for rhythm and theatrical escalation, not from trying to preserve every incident.
That gives the musical’s politics of solidarity a collective force in the auditorium. It is also the version London audiences can currently see: the production is at the Cambridge Theatre, and the official visitor information gives a running time of 2 hours 35 minutes including one interval, age guidance of 6+, and content notes covering flashing lights, lasers, loud sound effects, popped latex balloons and stage haze.
Where the 2022 film fits
The 2022 Roald Dahl’s Matilda the Musical sits between cinema and theatre. Netflix’s production notes call it a new take on the award-winning musical: Matthew Warchus directs, Dennis Kelly adapts the RSC production for the screen, and Tim Minchin supplies the original music and lyrics. It therefore shares the stage musical’s songs, structure and emphasis on Matilda helping others change their stories, but gains film’s ability to move beyond the auditorium and cut between intimate close-ups and large-scale movement.
The 2022 film therefore occupies a distinct place alongside the earlier versions. It is not the 1996 film with songs added, and it is not a recording of the West End show. It is a new screen translation of the musical: the same adaptation lineage, a different medium.
One story, different perspectives
The book centres Matilda’s inner life and Dahl’s sharp sense of the child who sees through adults. The 1996 film turns that story into a brisk, visually heightened family fantasy, while the 2022 film brings the musical’s songs and storytelling to the screen. The West End musical gives particular force to the way a group of children can turn imagination into shared action.
Each version brings a different part of Dahl’s premise into focus. Across the page, screen and stage, Matilda’s intelligence remains a source of resistance, while her relationships with Miss Honey and the other children give that resistance its emotional power.
Venues
Tags
Related articles
Hadestown Character Guide: Gods, Mortals and the Relationships Between Them
Hadestown’s characters form a web of love, power and survival rather than a straightforward good-versus-evil myth. This spoiler-aware guide explores how Orpheus, Eurydice, Hades, Persephone, Hermes, the Fates and the Wo…
Read articleThe Six Queens Explained: Who Each SIX Character Was in Real Life
SIX’s queens were far more than the rhyme “divorced, beheaded, died”. From Catherine of Aragon’s political resistance to Katherine Parr’s authorship and Anne of Cleves’s negotiated freedom, here is the real history behi…
Read articleLes Misérables Explained: The Real Paris Uprising Behind the Musical
The barricade in *Les Misérables* is not the 1789 French Revolution but the failed June Rebellion of 5–6 June 1832. Discover how Victor Hugo transformed a short-lived Paris insurrection into the musical's powerful argum…
Read articleIs The Phantom of the Opera Right for a First-Time West End Visit? Running Time, Story, Staging and What to Know
The Phantom of the Opera remains a distinctive first West End choice: a 2-hour-30-minute gothic musical in its original London home, with a soaring score, iconic staging and clear content guidance for families and first…
Read article